DRAFT
American Culture Association and Popular Culture Association
San Diego, California - Friday, April 2, 1999
San Diego Marriott Hotel - Panel 327 Columbia 3, North Tower. 2:30 pm

Panel: Popular American Architecture and Art
William H. Young, Chair

The Shrine Mosque:
Architecture of a Peculiar Brotherhood

Guillermo De Los Reyes
University of Pennsylvania
University of the Americas-Puebla, Mexico

Paul Rich
University of the Americas-Puebla
Hoover Institution, Stanford University

We would like to refer you to our article on the Shrine in the current issue of The Journal of American Culture. There we provide a good deal of historical background which we are just summarizing today.

In a number of American cities there is a building which would be quite at home inCairo or Damascus, with minarets and arches reminiscent of the Middle East. Hollywood´s Oscar ceremonies come from one such building and downtown Indianapolis has another. There are nearly 200 Shrine mosques in the United States and Canada.
The Shrine, or Mystic Shrine, or more properly. the Ancient Arabic Order Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, is an autonomous organization which recruits from those who have climbed the Masonic ladder and become either Knights Templar or thirty-second degree Scottish Rite Masons. An extremely wealthy organization, it endowments are well over ten billion dollars and thus comparable with those of Harvard. It is probably best known to the public for its charities such as hospitals for crippled children and its centers for severe burn victims, and for sponsorship of events such as the East-West Shrine football bowl and circuses.
But its buildings are equally remarkable. The architecture of Shrine buildings reflects the fact that, like many Masonic organizations, the Shrine has a legendary past which historians would challenge, claiming that it orginated in 656 AD somewhere in the Middle East. Its meeting halls are called mosques and its board of officers is known as a divan, with the presiding officer termed the potentate. The uniform is modeled after the one used by Zouaves in the French Empire and the red fez is its famous distinctive headdress. The fez became such a status symbol that it was borrowed by many other Masonic groups. Possibly the most remarkable use of it is by some Masonic Knight Templars, who sport an Islamic (albeit old-fashioned) fez with the Christian crusading cross!
The Shrine fez became a symbol of prestige, status, and money, so that it hs ben much imitated by other American fraternal orders. A competitive Masonic group, called the Mystic Order Veiled Prophets of theEnchanted Realm, or the Grotto, admits Masons who have only the first three degrees and is called "the poor man's Shrine" because members do not have to pay out to take additional degrees as the potential Nobles must before they can join the Shrine. The Grotto claims to base its ritual on the works of Hakem ben Haschem, the Al Mokanna or Veiled Prophet of Persia. Lacking the money that the Shrine has, the Grotto has never been able to compete architecturally, althugh there are a few noteworthy grottoes and it has a peculiar social ascendancy in St. Louis. The Grotto often shares a Masonic temple with several other organizations.
The Shrine itself has a number of associated groups which use its temples. The Royal Order of Jesters, which draws is members from active Shriners, and the Daughters of the Nile, Ladies Oriental Shrine, and Shrine Guilds are usually housed in the mosque. The Ancient Egyptian Order of Princesses of Sharemkhu differs from the Ladies Oriental Shrine in requiring a very close relationship such as that of wife or or sister. The Legion of Honor is for Shriners who served or are serving in the American military. (There is a Shrine for blacks, calling itself the Ancient Eyptian Order Nobles of the Mystic Shrine. The black Shrine has a women's group called the Daughers of Isis. The Grotto has a women's group called the Daughers of Mokanna.)
One of the most interesting affiliates of the Shrine is the Quetzacoatl: :
The Order of Quetzalcoatl was founded on March 14, 1945, by the late Arthur J. Elian, Recorder of Anezeh Temple in Mexico City, who was an outstanding student of Mexican lore as well as an active 33 degree Mason. His profound interest in all Masonic affairs crowned his efforts with all honors due him, having been Grand Master of the Muy Respectable Grand Logia Valle de Mexico, Emeritus Registrar of the Scottish Rite bodies, Recorder Emeritus of Anezeh Temple, and was fondly considered "Mr. Mason." The Order is based upon authentic Mexican legend and depicts the eternal struggle between the forces of good and evil. This is the only Order of American origin, following the Masonic Tenets of Brotherly Love, Relief and Truth, which were exemplified in the life of Quetzalcoatl. Members of the order are known as Coates (KO-AH-TAYS) or Artisans, and Indian word which means twin brothers. Artisans are truly the "workers" of the Temple.

The Quetzalcoatl, while drawings its members from the Shrine, is extremely distinctive and asks its members to go to Mexico as a part of their initiation: "The ritual is divided into three distinct parts. Once accepted into membership an individual is a Coate (or tribesman) of the Order and is given an obligation in which he promises that he will avail himself to receive the two degree of the Order, that on Initiation and that of Consecration. Upon initiation through a ritualistic full feathered ceremonial, a candidate is made an Artisan. Thereafter, by consecration ceremonies either at the annual 'Feast of Fire', or upon a pilgrimage to the pyramids in Mexico, primarily the Temple of Quetzalcoatl at Teotihuacan (Mexico City) or Chichen Itza (Cancun), a candidate may be consecrated a Master Artisan. The one with the other would be incomplete and it is urged that the candidate by informed that although initiation is highly instructive and of great interest, it is desirable that all candidates should, whenever possible, make the pilgrimage to the Ancient Temple of Quetzalcoatl."
With the exception of the Quetzalcoatl, whose meeting rooms inside the mosques have Mexican motifs, Shrine-related organizations go to great lengths to project an image of Islamic antiquity. The details are based on notions of what a Middle Eastern building looks like, although they often are eclectic and blend Persia, Egyptian and Islamic themes. Undoubtedly some, though not all, of the members think they are participating in very old ceremonies.
In actual fact the Shrine appears to have been invented by a medical doctor, Walter Millard Fleming. Dr. Fleming was active in Freemasonry in New York City in the 1870s. He belonged to both the Scottish and York rites of Masonry. In 1867 a friend of Dr. Fleming, William J. Florence, returned from a trip to Middle East full of enthusiasm for Islamic architecture and costumes. Florence was an actor and his real name was William Jermyn Conlin. One story about his part in the beginning of the Shrine holds that he actually received the Shrine ritual from another Mason, Charles T. McClenachan, before he went to the Middle East.
The passion for Orientalism proved contagious and along with McClenachan, Fleming and Florence devised a ritual which would be given only to Masons who had climbed the York or Scottish Rite ladders. This was an era when fraternalism was growing by leaps and bounds, and when there was an appetite for taking more degrees. The Odd Fellows, Pythians and other groups also created additional orders. Brotherhood was elitist in the sense that once one joined a fraternity, there loomed additional initiations that conferred more status.
The Shrine eventually established itself in nearly 200 cities in Canada, the United States, Mexico and Panama. It had a number of space demands which meant that sharing a building with lower level Masons was impractical. In some cases, such as Detroit, it was possible to build a gigantic complex that would include the Shrine along with other Masonic bodies, but the prevailing pattern was of separate Shrine edifices. These demands included:

a. The use of live animals such as camels in the initiation ceremonies.
b. Sponsorship of circuses as a fundraising activity.
c. A bar and the use of alcohol, which is prohibited in buildings where the basic blue lodge Masonry is present.
d. Organizing of parades, with units such as a motorcycle corps and band. A corollary was the need for a large parking area where trailers could be kept.
e. The fact that the Shrine only initiated 32nd degree or Knight Templar Maons, and hence could not allow other Masons to attend its meetings.

The Shrine, unlike other Masonic groups, limits the number of mosques in a region. A major city has one mosque, while it may have dozens of lodges and perhaps a half dozen Scottish Rite facilities. For example, Eastern Massachusetts has one mosque in a Boston suburb, but there are easily 100 different other Masonic buildings in the region belonging to one or another groups. This insistence on having a large member base has enabled the Shrine to build extremely elaborate facilities, which often are rented out. In a number of cities, the Shrine mosque has been the best facility available for professional stage events.
In consequence of the Shrine's success, many American cities have what look like Muslim mosques but are actually attended by "Prebyterians in search of a drink". Years ago, when contact with islam was rare and when there were no Moslems in any numbers in the United States, this architectural assertion had less significance than it does today. Indeed, one might think that the Islamic world would react with pleasure to the erection of Arabic-style buildings and the desire of leading Americans to adopt Middle Eastern motifs. That was not the case. Although imitation is supposed to be the sincerest flattery and a compliment, there is a profound irony to the relationship between Freemasonry and the Middle East. No world organization owes more to the Muslims in the way of its motifs, its symbols, and its rituals. Not only is the Shrine through-and through an expensive effort to import the flavor of the region to North America, but other Masonic degrees also display Islamic themes. But, ironically, no organization in the course of its presence in the Middle East has encountered more criticism, more disapproval, and more outright government persecution.
Despite all the minarets and arches and fezes, neither the Shrine nor any of the other Masonic organizations have managed to establish themselves in the Arab world to any extent. The use of Arab and Middle Eastern motifs, the references in the rituals to Allah, the hospitals for children have all been for naught in a public relations sense. Roman Catholics in Mexico City become members, but not Muslims in Mecca. Because of Muslim injunctions against Masonry, and because of the suspicions of Middle Eastern regimes about its political purposes, the fraternity has had a twilight existence in Arab world. Often the lodges meet in secret and in fear of their officers being carted off to the police station. A raid on one lodge in Saudi Arabia is described by a Mason in graphic detail:
Individually and as a group, the four Masons were subjected over and
over again to a never-ending interrogation concerning their Masonic
activities. An officer with the rank of major was in charge and
conducted the lengthy, detailed investigation. And all of the materials
seized during the raid on the Masonic Lodge were gathered and pored over
in fine detail. Later on, George Freygang related that the documentation in possession of the secret police before the infamous raid convinced him that the
Saudi Security had "copies of everything" (George's own words) that had been generated by many of the Masons, including a number of phone conversations.

In short, while well established in most of the world, Masonry truly is a clandestine organization in much of the Arab world and the Shrine from an Arab view is the most despised part of Masonry ‹ notwithstanding public relations efforts to achieve a better image and the fact that one of it is so Islamic in flavor.

(The present situation of Freemasonry in countries where the majority of the population are Muslims is precarious, despite long efforts to establish a Masonic presence:
The first Lodge erected in the Middle East was established by Scotland
at Aden in 1850. This appears to have been followed by a Lodge in
Palestine about 1873. However, most Masonic development was spawned in
this century, beginning with English Lodges located in Iraq shortly
after the First World War. Unfortunately, the lot of the Craft in the
Middle East has not generally been a happy one. Only in Israel has
Masonry flourished, with that country possessing a regular Grand Lodge.

Outside of Israel very few Lodges remain, with the oldest survivor being
a Scottish Lodge in Jordan, dating from 1925. British-warranted Lodges
that formerly existed in Iraq, South Yemen (Aden), and elsewhere on the
Arabian Peninsula have all been extinguished as the result of political
pressure. A few German-warranted Lodges work in Arabia, having been set
up in only very recent years. However, their longer term future must be
uncertain. In Iran, which has lately had a regular Grand Lodge,
Freemasonry has been destroyed, almost literally, and this occurrence
must rate as one of the greatest tragedies in Masonic history. In short,
in view of the turbulent political and religious situation in the Arab
world, it would appear most unlikely that the Craft will expand in the Middle East in the foreseeable future.)

Most Nobles of the Shrine would deny that there is any just cause for the animosity or that Masonry conflicts with religious views. Although outlawed in Saudi Arabia, the lodge leaders who function there illegally like to think that their presence is benign and that the opposition is because of misunderstanding. Many conservative Muslims would be much less charitable and say that they understand all too well. These differing opinions depend partly on interpretation of symbolism. What Masons think is "simply fraternal ritual" is to some of the deeply religious, Muslim or Christian, a parody of their faith. A Masonic authority comments on the custom of lodges of displaying a version of the Bible on the lodge altar:

The Bible is not displayed on our altars now and has never been for the reason that Masons are required to believe its teachings. We know that there is a very large element of the Craft the world over who do not believe the teachings of the New Testament. We know that many individual Masons do not believe portions of the Old Testament. Hence, unless we are perpetrating a grim mockery, we do not employ the bible as as a profession that we as a Society accept all its teachings and doctrines...Masonry as an organized society does not and has never exacted this belief of its members. It can, therefore, have no other place in our lodges than that of a symbol...It is a symbol of Truth, of Divine Truth, of all Truth, whether drawn from some book of Revelation or from the Great Book of Nature.
Such a view may seem perfectly innocuous to a secularist, to others it is the height of blasphemy. One critic remarks, "that in order to sell phoney Chanel No.5 on Oxford Street, you would make it look like the real thing. Freemasonry has chaplains, prayers, ceremony, candles, and all the 'trappings' of religion. Because selling phoney Chanel No.5 is wrong, so is Freemasonry."
The Chanel analogy neatly describes the opposition of Muslims to the Shrine and to Masonry in general. When the Nobles pray to Mecca at their Shrine ceremonies, a Muslim doesn't see how this can be divorced from religion. The prohibition of Masonry in the Muslim countries of the Middle East is partly because there are aspects of Masonry, be it the Shrine or Grotto or Daughters of Isis, or simply the blue lodge giving the first three degrees, which religious people feel verge on mocking their faith.
Ultimately the story of Masonry in Arab lands is a sad one and the influence the order had with the Arabs is problematical: one Victorian-era member waylaid in the desert was spared by a bedouin about to cut off his
finger to acquire his Masonic ring. Asked if he had given the great high-sign, he recounted: "I did not. The fellow may have been a Mason
‹ there are lodges in Damascus, Aleppo and Baghdad ‹ but he was no brother of mine, for though he left me my ring, he took my watch, my money, my letter of credit and my baggage." Considering the way in which Masonry used Islamic motifs in a secular way, the aggrieved traveler was probably lucky to escape with his life. That the biggest mosque in Detroit or Indianapolis has a membership which includes Catholics, Prebyterians, Jews, and Episcopalians is one of the ironies of cultural history.

Notes...