DRAFT
American Culture Association and Popular Culture Association
San Diego, California - Saturday, April 3, 1999
San Diego Marriott Hotel - Panel 428 Columbia 3, NorthTower. 10:30 am

Panel: American Art and Architecture: The Uses of Space in American Fraternalism
Paul Rich, Chair



Architecture and
Scottish Rite Masonry:
A Latin American Perspective

Guillermo De Los Reyes
University of Pennsylvania
University of the Americas-Puebla, Mexico


Of the several varieties of Freemasonry which our panel is discussing today, the one which often has the most imposing Masonic building in a city is the so-called Scottish Rite. That is true in Washington, in Indianapolis, and in fact here in San Diego. Corollary of this in my view, is that Scottish Rite Masonry is the most urban of all Masonic movements, both in Latin America and in the United States, and in the brief time available to us I hope to explain why that is.


Although Masonry, as I will explain, did extend itself into rural areas, it is also true that Masonry's growth in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries parallels the growth of the modern city. A little historical background may be helpful. In England there is little hard evidence of lodges meeting during the seventeenth century. The lodge which made the famous antiquarian Elias Ashmole a Mason in 1646 is an example. In Scotland, documented lodges go back much earlier, at least to the end of the sixteenth century, but whether they are truly forebearers of the modern secret society is much debated. Isolated Masonic activity may have occurred in Latin America during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but it is in the nineteenth century and later that Masonic influence becomes significant.
It is wrong to speak about Masonry as if it were a single, monolithic entity. That is probably the biggest mistake made when historians and other scholars discuss it en passant. During the nineteenth century, when Freemasonry became widespread in both North and South America, there were, as there are now, a number of competing rites ‹ ritual systems consisting of a series of initiations. The Rites of Swedenborg, and Memphis, the Ancient and Primitive Rite, and the Rite of the Beneficent Knights of the Holy City are all examples. They share in common the notion of a succession of initiations, each based on the previous ones. There is in fact a Grand College of Rites which takes under control those rites that are no longer active, such as the Mizraim and Martinist, bodies which could be described irreverently as a sort of refrigerator for rites.
Only a few of these rites became large enough to build their own temples. But everyone who became a Mason took, as Dr. Rich has explained in his introduction, the first three degrees of entered apprentice, fellowcraft, and master mason. The alleged emotional stress produced by the third or master mason degree entered the language as the phrase "giving someone the third degree". Beyond those first three levels that were available in the symbolic or blue lodges, there were many options, including some organizations with a single initiatory degree and others such as the rites I have mentioned with a succession of degrees. Systems were created to bring order to the more than 1000 degrees created, and many of the "loose" degrees were captured by the various rites.
In fact, entire rites were incorporated into larger groupings, an example being the Cryptic Rite which now is an intermediary step between the Royal Arch and the Templar degrees in the York Rite. Each of these ritual systems, although part of the Masonic family, achieved a certain autonomy and even today he endowments and other properties are separartely held. Being a Mason does not make one eligible for the charities or retirement homes of the Eastern Star or Royal Arch, and the Scottish Rite hospìtals are not operated in the same way as the blue lodge hospitals.
In Latin America the situation was somewhat similar to North America with respect to the development of a number of diffrent kinds of Masonry. A Mexican authority explained that:
De todos los ritos, son considerados como los principales el Rito Escocés Antiguo y Aceptado y el Rito Inglés de York o Rito de Real Arco. Sin embargo, en algunos países han existido ritos nacionales que han demostrado gran actividad, como el Rito Moderno Francés, del que surgió la Revolución Francesa; el Rito del Celeste Imperio, que se practica en Turquía, el Rito Sueco, el Tien-Foe-Whe, de la China; el Benemérito Rito Nacional Mexicano, de gloriosa memoria en nuestro pais, y muchos más. En México, la gran mayoría de los masones están afiliados al Rito Escocés Antiguo y Aceptado, aunque también existen logias yorkinas, principalmente para personas de habla inglesa, así como otros cuerpos que pertenecen al Rito Nacional Mexicano, al Rito Primitivé de la Masonería universal, al del Derecho Humano ("Droit humain"), al de Adopción y a otros más.

Architecture and the rituals performed go together and vary from country to country. In Scandinavia, the rituals at least tangentially connected with Swedenborgian Masonry would be a part of any discussion of Masonic architecture. Although there are some traces there of the Scottish Rite, the architecture it has produced is little.
But in North and South America, the Scottish Rite has produced an enormous amount of architecture. Moreover, the growth and evolution of Scottish Rite Masonry with which we are concerned is urban Masonry. While the opportunity to acquire the more stratospheric and extravagant distinctions awarded by secret ritualistic societies (Grand Pontiff, Knight of the Brazen Serpent, Master of the Royal Secret, and so on, almost ad infinitum) are not mentioned as a urban amenity, it may be that the existence of fraternal orders should be included in the criteria for a hierarchical classification of urban places. Their activities support Carl Fischer's thesis that diversity achieved through subcultures is a psychologically vital to urbanization. An investigation of the varieties of ritualistic organizations in urban settings answers the call of Henri Lefebvre to investigate the city's "concealed daily life...its underground life".
In the case of Latin America, the preeminence of Scottish Rite Freemasonry complemented the rise of the cities, and the phenomenon provides at least a minor gloss on the place of urban ideology and urban primacy as forces in the Latin Amerian political culture. What I wish to do this morning is to offer some comments on the Scottish Rite in both North and South America, and I believe that both situations support the urban view of the Scottish Rite.
I wish to stress that when we consider Masonic architecture we are dealing with an international phenomenon. There is little doubt about Masonry having a major role in Latin American history. For example, the Venezuelan patriot Francisco de Miranda (1750? - 1816) became a Mason in 1796 and used London lodges to discuss plans for overthrowing Spain before going to Venezuela and organizing, in company with Simon Bolívar, the celebrated Protectora de las Virtudes Lodge:

A secret lodge modeled after the one Miranda had established in London was created to guide the independence movement. The degree to which the parent lodge and the subsequent American daughter lodges were Masonic in orientation is subject to speculation, but it is indisputable that the ideals and goals of European free masonry inspired many of the lodge members in the colonies. The lodge, with Miranda and Bolívar in it, quickly seized the initiative and took control of the independence movement in Caracas...

Bolívar (1783-1830) had received his initial three degrees in Cadíz, Spain, and then taken Scottish Rite degrees in Paris in 1807. His Scottish Rite regalia are exhibited in the museum of the Grand Lodge of New York. Fernández Cabrelli in his book La Francmasonería en la Independencia de hispanoamérica quotes Antonio Zuñiga about the importance of the London lodges to him and other leaders in the South American wars of independence:
Meanwhile initiations and affiliations rapidly increased; whenever a [South] American was in London, he was overwhelmed by all the propaganda that the Lodge put forward. After listening to the American visitors, the Masons would support their goals, and always persuaded them to join to the Lodges so they could work together for Independence....The Creoles that were able to go to Europe - among them we can name Miranda, Bolívar, San Martín, Belgrano, Alvear, Mier, Narino and some other ‹ they noticed all of the political and cultural ideologies that were ongoing in Europe. When they returned to America, they brought those ideologies back with them. Those ideologies turned into actions and decisions that were aimed to accelerate the process of Independence.
In Chile, José de San Martín (1778-1850) who had also received his initial degrees in Cadíz, and who had joined Miranda's lodge in London, helped organize Logia Lautarina. Members who even revealed its existence were threatened with death, and any brethren holding office were expected to discuss important decisions with the rest of the membership.
Such Masonic activities had very modest space requirements. In the eighteenth century meetings often took place in taverns, and the equipment could be kept in a chest. The rituals did not demand elaborate staging. But all this was to change.

Urbanization and Associationalism
If the influence of Masonry in Latin American has been remarkable, the urbanization of Latin America has been equally astounding. John Rennee Short write in The Urban Order: "In 1940 two-thirds of the people in South America lived in the countryside. By 1990 two-thirds of a hugely expanded population lived in cities, especially the big cities...São Paulo in Brazil increased from 2.8 million in 1950 to 16 million in 1990, while Caracas, over the same period, incrased from an insignificant 700,000 to 4 million...In Uruguay one out of every two people live in Montevideo, while in Argentina one out of every three people live in Buenos Aires. Colombia has a population of 31 million, but over 4 million live in the capital and largest city, Bogotá. The concentration is even more marked in Peru: of a population of 21 million, 6.5 million live in Lima. The reasons for this urbanization are invariably related by commentators to the centralization of government, changes in agriculture, and of course population growth, all of which contributed to despondency about opportunity in rural areas. Flight to the cities throughout the continent would have gone on regardless of what measures might have been taken, but the lack of rural opportunity which has encouraged the growth of mega cities is underscored by the peculiar history of Latin American Freemasonry.
To appreciate how Scottish Rite Masonry and urbanization became intertwined, it should be kept in mind that Latin America has never had the number of voluntary groups that the United States has had, and certainly not the rural voluntary groups. To appreciate the roles and the contrast in rural and small town associational life between the United States and Latin America is instructive when considering the role of Freemasonry. In 1944, John Gunther started on a thirteen-month field trip to 300 communities around the United States doing the research that permitted him to produce Inside U.S.A., an amazing tour de force in which Gunther sought to find out what or who ran America. One thing that impressed him, as it had Tocqueville, was the American propensity for organizations. Gunther remarked on what Gabriel Almond and Sydney Verba were to single out later in their classic Civic Culture: "Organizational participation in the United States, both in the total number who are members and the number who are members of several organizations, is much higher than that of any other country."
In Middletown, Ohio, Gunther noted among other groups the American Citizens Club, American Hellenic Educational and Progressive Association, American Legion, Ancient Order of Hibernians, Armco Girls Association, Blythe Williams American Legion (colored), Business and Professional Women's Club, Chamber of Commerce, Civic Association, Civitan Club, Middletown Chapter of the Congress of Industrial Organizations, Co-Operative Club, Fabriating Foremen's Club, Federation of Women's Clubs, Junior Chamber of Commerce, Kiwanis Club, Lions Club, Grange, Red Cross, Rotary, Spanish American War Veterans, and the Veterans of Foreign War. If their widespread presence did not ultimately arrest population drift to the cities, these groups nevertheless gave small town life a vitality it otherwise would have lacked.
Belonging to thse associations was also something of a political necessity, as it has been in Latin America as well when they have been available. Senator James Davis of Pennsylvania, according to Gunther, ran the national Moose and was a member of the Masons, Mystic Shrine, Grotto, Odd Fellows, Knights of Pythias, Elks, Eagles, Forests, Protected Home Circle, Knights of the Golden Eagle, Woomen of the World, and Maccabees. He described Senator Kenneth Mc Kellar of Tennessee as "...a bachelor, a prohibitionist, a Prebyterian, a 32nd Degree Masons, a Shriner, and an Oddfellow." When he got to Kansas, Gunther found that the congeries of forces that ran the state included, " ...the Masonic orders" and "The noon-day luncheon clubs," remarking that "It has taken this book far too long to get around to more than general mention of such universal American institutions as the Kiwanis, Lions, and Rotary. Generally, they fit in which the local chamber of commerce, which means that they tie up with the banks, department stores, utilites, and so on, throughout the state."
There were as well specifically small town and rural associations in the United States, groups whose rituals glorified rural life. One Middletown society that Gunther mentions is the Grange, or the Patrons of Husbandry, which he also encountered elsewhere in his journeys. Like many of the organizations that he mentions, the Grange was a familiar part of the rural scene. Gunther found that it was the dominant affiliation of farmers in Orgeon, that it was a major pressure group in Washington State, and that most farmers in Vermont belonged. The Grange is a ritualistic secret society reminisent of the Freemasons but with a particular rural focus. However, most American organizations made an effort to establish themselves in small communities and it is almost impossible to find even a hamlet of a few hundred people without its lodge hall. This ubiquitousness was certainly true of Freemasonry, which certainly was among the oldest and oddest of the societies that Gunther encountered. The variety of Masonry that prospered in rural areas that he visited was known as the York Rite and it was by far the predominant Masonic affiliation of nineteenth-century Americans.

Masonry Paralleling Urbanization
In the United States during the nineteenth century, the York Rite was almost synonymus with Masonry. It was so popular and prevalent that it was sometimes pridefully, and quite erroneously, called the American Rite.
It was and is composed of several autonomous bodies. Application had to be made to each one. A candidate who had the first three or blue lodge degrees was compelled to make an additional effort in terms of learning more esoteria and paying various fees: in going up the York ladder he would join a Chapter of Royal Arch Masons, then the Council of Royal and Select Masters, which conferred the so-called Cryptic degrees, and finally join the Knights Templar, whose commanderies conferred the chivalric orders. While it is often remarked that there are no "higher" degrees in Masonry as the first three degrees make a man into a Mason, -- -- and that the other degrees are simply intended to amplify his Masonic knowledge rather than push him up the rungs of a ladder, -- acquiring status by taking more degrees was very popular and the choice between the rites occasined considerable debate. The Yorkists brought these "honors" to the countryside as well as to the city.
The York system, since it culminated in Knight Templarism and dubbed the candidate as a Knight of Malta, a Knight of the Mediterranean Pass, a Knight of St. Paul, and finally as a Templar, required of those who wished to receive its penultimate honors that they be Christians. That certainly was no problem in rural America.
Yet, Latin American Freemasonry has a deserved reputation for being anti clerical, and even anti-religious. The anomaly is explained by the fact that while the York Rite prospered in the United States and Canada, and still gives the Scottish Rite some competition, the Scottish Rite, completely carried the day throughout the rest of the hemisphere.
Some Architectural Consequences
This Scottish triumph had some practical as well as ideological consequences as far as the building of Masonic temples in Latin American cities was concerned. The interest in adequately housing the rituals should not be underestimated. All
secret ritualistic societies, as our panel makes clear, place enormous importance on the arrangements of their meeting rooms, relying on architecture to help impart the appropriate solemnity during the initiation ceremonies. The Odd Fellows, Elks, Moose, Eagles, Pythians, and Knights of Columbus each have architectural requirements for their ceremonies. But none of these organizations gives as much attention to architecture as does Freemasonry, which conveys its interest in the building arts through a large special vocabulary. A point that our panel seeks to make is that Masonry in fact uses a number of different architectural motifs: As Dr. Rich has pointed out, the Shrine relies on Islamic designs, the Knights Templar use medieval architecture.
The York bodies had rituals which could be enacted in a relatively small space, and so they were able to use the lodge halls built for the symbolic, blue lodge degrees. Some cosmetic changes were necessary, but the same room could do for York initiations as for the craft or symbolic degrees. This enabled the Yorkists in North America to establish themselves in small towns.
However, the Scottish Rite was a different story. At the start of the nineteenth century, it was insignificant numerically in either North or South Ameria. But it had several advantages as well as problems that were to become apparent. Although on paper it had several separate institutions giving degrees, in actual practice the Scottish Rite was much more unified than the York Rite. In practice it was administered as a single organization. This meant that when it succeeded it had a larger income than the York bodies, each of which had their own treasuries. And the Scottish Rite needed that income as its rituals were reworked and enlarged upon until they became large an expensive stage productions which them membership enjoyed seeing as spectators rather than as participants, which seems one reason for its growth and its eventual eclipsing in many jurisdictions of the York Rite. Moreover, the general public came to recognize that the 32nd and 33rd degrees awarded by the Scottish Rite were an accolade and distinction which never really attached to the Knight Templar degree in the York system.
Conclusion: The Urban Rite
The Scottish degrees were more akin to theatrical productions than to simple initiations in the lodge room over the general store. They also required the candidate to make a considerable financial investment as he had to pay fees for each degree. While it was possible in some smaller cities to attract enough candidates and find the resources to put on the rituals up to the level of the 14th degree or sometimes the 18th degree, the degrees above that came to be the prerogative of the large city. Since Masonry grew as cities grew, and since, although it was present in both North and South America during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, its expansion parallels urban growth in the Hemisphere, the developing connection between Scottish Rite Masonry and urbanization is readily suggested.

In no case did the Scottish Rite as it become worldwide establish itself in the countryside as did the York bodies. Today one can still take the York degrees in the goldfields of Western Australia or in a fishing port in Northern Maine, but if a candidate wants to take the Scottish degrees, then a city must be at hand.
So, in contrast with the continuing if unequal rivalry of York and Scottish Masonry is some places, the story of Freemasonry in Latin America is one of the dominance of urban Scottish Rite Freemasonry. While a number of different Masonic systems have persisted, the region is particularly identified with what is in fact one of the more lavish rites in terms of initiation dramas. The Scottish variety came to dominate and still does dominates the scene.

In many American cities the Scottish Rite similarly became predominant. The Yorkists have taken a beating everywhere. But they still have an advantage in small towns, where the Scottish Rite has never been able to achieve the success it has in urban centers. When Latin American establish connectitons with American Masonry, this Scottish urban predominance means that the American they seek out are often ScottishR iters.
Kevin Christiano writes about urban growth that, "...differentiation of social institutions and heterogeneity of social forms are companions to population growth as a result of a at least three related processes: ecological, demographic, and cultural." Ecologically, competition for resources forces specialization. Demographics undergird the introduction of social influences in the city. The cultural process means that the city has "subcultural constituencies of sufficient size to support specialized ‹ even eccentric ‹ cultural institutions, associations, and services which are impossible to sustain in smaller locales." Whether secret ritualistic movements like the Scottish Rite can be counted as an "urban amenity" is perhaps a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder,-- but regardless, Scotish Rite Masonry is one of the most outstanding examples of a fraternal movement that was predominantly urban.


---NOTES