DRAFT
American Culture Association and Popular Culture Association
San Diego, California - Saturday, April 3, 1999
San Diego Marriott Hotel - Panel 428 Columbia 3, NorthTower. 10:30 am
Panel: American Art and Architecture: The Uses of Space in American Fraternalism
Paul Rich, Chair
Architecture and
Scottish Rite Masonry:
A Latin American Perspective
Guillermo De Los Reyes
University of Pennsylvania
University of the Americas-Puebla, Mexico
Of the several varieties of Freemasonry which our panel is discussing today, the
one which often has the most imposing Masonic building in a city is the so-called
Scottish Rite. That is true in Washington, in Indianapolis, and in fact here in San
Diego. Corollary of this in my view, is that Scottish Rite Masonry is the most
urban of all Masonic movements, both in Latin America and in the United States,
and in the brief time available to us I hope to explain why that is.
Although Masonry, as I will explain, did extend itself into rural areas, it is
also true that Masonry's growth in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries
parallels the growth of the modern city. A little historical background may be
helpful. In England there is little hard evidence of lodges meeting during the
seventeenth century. The lodge which made the famous antiquarian Elias
Ashmole a Mason in 1646 is an example. In Scotland, documented lodges go back
much earlier, at least to the end of the sixteenth century, but whether they are
truly forebearers of the modern secret society is much debated. Isolated Masonic
activity may have occurred in Latin America during the seventeenth and
eighteenth centuries, but it is in the nineteenth century and later that Masonic
influence becomes significant.
It is wrong to speak about Masonry as if it were a single, monolithic entity.
That is probably the biggest mistake made when historians and other scholars
discuss it en passant. During the nineteenth century, when Freemasonry became
widespread in both North and South America, there were, as there are now, a
number of competing rites ritual systems consisting of a series of initiations. The
Rites of Swedenborg, and Memphis, the Ancient and Primitive Rite, and the Rite
of the Beneficent Knights of the Holy City are all examples. They share in
common the notion of a succession of initiations, each based on the previous ones.
There is in fact a Grand College of Rites which takes under control those rites that
are no longer active, such as the Mizraim and Martinist, bodies which could be
described irreverently as a sort of refrigerator for rites.
Only a few of these rites became large enough to build their own temples.
But everyone who became a Mason took, as Dr. Rich has explained in his
introduction, the first three degrees of entered apprentice, fellowcraft, and master
mason. The alleged emotional stress produced by the third or master mason degree
entered the language as the phrase "giving someone the third degree". Beyond
those first three levels that were available in the symbolic or blue lodges, there were
many options, including some organizations with a single initiatory degree and
others such as the rites I have mentioned with a succession of degrees. Systems were
created to bring order to the more than 1000 degrees created, and many of the
"loose" degrees were captured by the various rites.
In fact, entire rites were incorporated into larger groupings, an example
being the Cryptic Rite which now is an intermediary step between the Royal Arch
and the Templar degrees in the York Rite. Each of these ritual systems, although
part of the Masonic family, achieved a certain autonomy and even today he
endowments and other properties are separartely held. Being a Mason does not
make one eligible for the charities or retirement homes of the Eastern Star or
Royal Arch, and the Scottish Rite hospìtals are not operated in the same way as the
blue lodge hospitals.
In Latin America the situation was somewhat similar to North America
with respect to the development of a number of diffrent kinds of Masonry. A
Mexican authority explained that:
De todos los ritos, son considerados como los principales el Rito Escocés
Antiguo y Aceptado y el Rito Inglés de York o Rito de Real Arco. Sin embargo, en
algunos países han existido ritos nacionales que han demostrado gran actividad,
como el Rito Moderno Francés, del que surgió la Revolución Francesa; el Rito del
Celeste Imperio, que se practica en Turquía, el Rito Sueco, el Tien-Foe-Whe, de la
China; el Benemérito Rito Nacional Mexicano, de gloriosa memoria en nuestro
pais, y muchos más. En México, la gran mayoría de los masones están afiliados al
Rito Escocés Antiguo y Aceptado, aunque también existen logias yorkinas,
principalmente para personas de habla inglesa, así como otros cuerpos que
pertenecen al Rito Nacional Mexicano, al Rito Primitivé de la Masonería
universal, al del Derecho Humano ("Droit humain"), al de Adopción y a otros
más.
Architecture and the rituals performed go together and vary from country
to country. In Scandinavia, the rituals at least tangentially connected with
Swedenborgian Masonry would be a part of any discussion of Masonic architecture.
Although there are some traces there of the Scottish Rite, the architecture it has
produced is little.
But in North and South America, the Scottish Rite has produced an
enormous amount of architecture. Moreover, the growth and evolution of Scottish
Rite Masonry with which we are concerned is urban Masonry. While the
opportunity to acquire the more stratospheric and extravagant distinctions awarded
by secret ritualistic societies (Grand Pontiff, Knight of the Brazen Serpent, Master
of the Royal Secret, and so on, almost ad infinitum) are not mentioned as a urban
amenity, it may be that the existence of fraternal orders should be included in the
criteria for a hierarchical classification of urban places. Their activities support
Carl Fischer's thesis that diversity achieved through subcultures is a
psychologically vital to urbanization. An investigation of the varieties of
ritualistic organizations in urban settings answers the call of Henri Lefebvre to
investigate the city's "concealed daily life...its underground life".
In the case of Latin America, the preeminence of Scottish Rite Freemasonry
complemented the rise of the cities, and the phenomenon provides at least a minor
gloss on the place of urban ideology and urban primacy as forces in the Latin
Amerian political culture. What I wish to do this morning is to offer some
comments on the Scottish Rite in both North and South America, and I believe
that both situations support the urban view of the Scottish Rite.
I wish to stress that when we consider Masonic architecture we are dealing
with an international phenomenon. There is little doubt about Masonry having a
major role in Latin American history. For example, the Venezuelan patriot
Francisco de Miranda (1750? - 1816) became a Mason in 1796 and used London
lodges to discuss plans for overthrowing Spain before going to Venezuela and
organizing, in company with Simon Bolívar, the celebrated Protectora de las
Virtudes Lodge:
- A secret lodge modeled after the one Miranda had established in London was
created to guide the independence movement. The degree to which the
parent lodge and the subsequent American daughter lodges were Masonic in
orientation is subject to speculation, but it is indisputable that the ideals and
goals of European free masonry inspired many of the lodge members in the
colonies. The lodge, with Miranda and Bolívar in it, quickly seized the
initiative and took control of the independence movement in Caracas...
Bolívar (1783-1830) had received his initial three degrees in Cadíz, Spain,
and then taken Scottish Rite degrees in Paris in 1807. His Scottish Rite regalia
are exhibited in the museum of the Grand Lodge of New York. Fernández
Cabrelli in his book La Francmasonería en la Independencia de hispanoamérica
quotes Antonio Zuñiga about the importance of the London lodges to him and
other leaders in the South American wars of independence:
- Meanwhile initiations and affiliations rapidly increased; whenever a [South]
American was in London, he was overwhelmed by all the propaganda that
the Lodge put forward. After listening to the American visitors, the Masons
would support their goals, and always persuaded them to join to the Lodges
so they could work together for Independence....The Creoles that were able
to go to Europe - among them we can name Miranda, Bolívar, San Martín,
Belgrano, Alvear, Mier, Narino and some other they noticed all of the
political and cultural ideologies that were ongoing in Europe. When they
returned to America, they brought those ideologies back with them. Those
ideologies turned into actions and decisions that were aimed to accelerate the
process of Independence.
In Chile, José de San Martín (1778-1850) who had also received his initial
degrees in Cadíz, and who had joined Miranda's lodge in London, helped
organize Logia Lautarina. Members who even revealed its existence were
threatened with death, and any brethren holding office were expected to discuss
important decisions with the rest of the membership.
Such Masonic activities had very modest space requirements. In the eighteenth
century meetings often took place in taverns, and the equipment could be kept in a
chest. The rituals did not demand elaborate staging. But all this was to change.
Urbanization and Associationalism
If the influence of Masonry in Latin American has been remarkable, the
urbanization of Latin America has been equally astounding. John Rennee Short
write in The Urban Order: "In 1940 two-thirds of the people in South America
lived in the countryside. By 1990 two-thirds of a hugely expanded population lived
in cities, especially the big cities...São Paulo in Brazil increased from 2.8 million in
1950 to 16 million in 1990, while Caracas, over the same period, incrased from an
insignificant 700,000 to 4 million...In Uruguay one out of every two people live in
Montevideo, while in Argentina one out of every three people live in Buenos
Aires. Colombia has a population of 31 million, but over 4 million live in the
capital and largest city, Bogotá. The concentration is even more marked in Peru: of
a population of 21 million, 6.5 million live in Lima. The reasons for this
urbanization are invariably related by commentators to the centralization of
government, changes in agriculture, and of course population growth, all of which
contributed to despondency about opportunity in rural areas. Flight to the cities
throughout the continent would have gone on regardless of what measures might
have been taken, but the lack of rural opportunity which has encouraged the
growth of mega cities is underscored by the peculiar history of Latin American
Freemasonry.
To appreciate how Scottish Rite Masonry and urbanization became
intertwined, it should be kept in mind that Latin America has never had the
number of voluntary groups that the United States has had, and certainly not the
rural voluntary groups. To appreciate the roles and the contrast in rural and small
town associational life between the United States and Latin America is instructive
when considering the role of Freemasonry. In 1944, John Gunther started on a
thirteen-month field trip to 300 communities around the United States doing the
research that permitted him to produce Inside U.S.A., an amazing tour de force in
which Gunther sought to find out what or who ran America. One thing that
impressed him, as it had Tocqueville, was the American propensity for
organizations. Gunther remarked on what Gabriel Almond and Sydney Verba were
to single out later in their classic Civic Culture: "Organizational participation in
the United States, both in the total number who are members and the number
who are members of several organizations, is much higher than that of any other
country."
In Middletown, Ohio, Gunther noted among other groups the American
Citizens Club, American Hellenic Educational and Progressive Association,
American Legion, Ancient Order of Hibernians, Armco Girls Association, Blythe
Williams American Legion (colored), Business and Professional Women's Club,
Chamber of Commerce, Civic Association, Civitan Club, Middletown Chapter of
the Congress of Industrial Organizations, Co-Operative Club, Fabriating
Foremen's Club, Federation of Women's Clubs, Junior Chamber of Commerce,
Kiwanis Club, Lions Club, Grange, Red Cross, Rotary, Spanish American War
Veterans, and the Veterans of Foreign War. If their widespread presence did not
ultimately arrest population drift to the cities, these groups nevertheless gave small
town life a vitality it otherwise would have lacked.
Belonging to thse associations was also something of a political necessity, as
it has been in Latin America as well when they have been available. Senator James
Davis of Pennsylvania, according to Gunther, ran the national Moose and was a
member of the Masons, Mystic Shrine, Grotto, Odd Fellows, Knights of Pythias,
Elks, Eagles, Forests, Protected Home Circle, Knights of the Golden Eagle,
Woomen of the World, and Maccabees. He described Senator Kenneth Mc Kellar
of Tennessee as "...a bachelor, a prohibitionist, a Prebyterian, a 32nd Degree
Masons, a Shriner, and an Oddfellow." When he got to Kansas, Gunther found
that the congeries of forces that ran the state included, " ...the Masonic orders" and
"The noon-day luncheon clubs," remarking that "It has taken this book far too
long to get around to more than general mention of such universal American
institutions as the Kiwanis, Lions, and Rotary. Generally, they fit in which the local
chamber of commerce, which means that they tie up with the banks, department
stores, utilites, and so on, throughout the state."
There were as well specifically small town and rural associations in the
United States, groups whose rituals glorified rural life. One Middletown society
that Gunther mentions is the Grange, or the Patrons of Husbandry, which he also
encountered elsewhere in his journeys. Like many of the organizations that he
mentions, the Grange was a familiar part of the rural scene. Gunther found that it
was the dominant affiliation of farmers in Orgeon, that it was a major pressure
group in Washington State, and that most farmers in Vermont belonged. The
Grange is a ritualistic secret society reminisent of the Freemasons but with a
particular rural focus. However, most American organizations made an effort to
establish themselves in small communities and it is almost impossible to find even a
hamlet of a few hundred people without its lodge hall. This ubiquitousness was
certainly true of Freemasonry, which certainly was among the oldest and oddest of
the societies that Gunther encountered. The variety of Masonry that prospered in
rural areas that he visited was known as the York Rite and it was by far the
predominant Masonic affiliation of nineteenth-century Americans.
Masonry Paralleling Urbanization
In the United States during the nineteenth century, the York Rite was
almost synonymus with Masonry. It was so popular and prevalent that it was
sometimes pridefully, and quite erroneously, called the American Rite.
It was and is composed of several autonomous bodies. Application had to be made to
each one. A candidate who had the first three or blue lodge degrees was compelled
to make an additional effort in terms of learning more esoteria and paying various
fees: in going up the York ladder he would join a Chapter of Royal Arch Masons,
then the Council of Royal and Select Masters, which conferred the so-called
Cryptic degrees, and finally join the Knights Templar, whose commanderies
conferred the chivalric orders. While it is often remarked that there are no
"higher" degrees in Masonry as the first three degrees make a man into a Mason, --
-- and that the other degrees are simply intended to amplify his Masonic
knowledge rather than push him up the rungs of a ladder, -- acquiring status by
taking more degrees was very popular and the choice between the rites occasined
considerable debate. The Yorkists brought these "honors" to the countryside as
well as to the city.
The York system, since it culminated in Knight Templarism and dubbed the
candidate as a Knight of Malta, a Knight of the Mediterranean Pass, a Knight of
St. Paul, and finally as a Templar, required of those who wished to receive its
penultimate honors that they be Christians. That certainly was no problem in rural
America.
Yet, Latin American Freemasonry has a deserved reputation for being anti
clerical, and even anti-religious. The anomaly is explained by the fact that while
the York Rite prospered in the United States and Canada, and still gives the
Scottish Rite some competition, the Scottish Rite, completely carried the day
throughout the rest of the hemisphere.
Some Architectural Consequences
This Scottish triumph had some practical as well as ideological consequences
as far as the building of Masonic temples in Latin American cities was concerned.
The interest in adequately housing the rituals should not be underestimated. All
secret ritualistic societies, as our panel makes clear, place enormous importance on
the arrangements of their meeting rooms, relying on architecture to help impart
the appropriate solemnity during the initiation ceremonies. The Odd Fellows,
Elks, Moose, Eagles, Pythians, and Knights of Columbus each have architectural
requirements for their ceremonies. But none of these organizations gives as much
attention to architecture as does Freemasonry, which conveys its interest in the
building arts through a large special vocabulary. A point that our panel seeks to
make is that Masonry in fact uses a number of different architectural motifs: As
Dr. Rich has pointed out, the Shrine relies on Islamic designs, the Knights Templar
use medieval architecture.
The York bodies had rituals which could be enacted in a relatively small space,
and so they were able to use the lodge halls built for the symbolic, blue lodge
degrees. Some cosmetic changes were necessary, but the same room could do for
York initiations as for the craft or symbolic degrees. This enabled the Yorkists in
North America to establish themselves in small towns.
However, the Scottish Rite was a different story. At the start of the
nineteenth century, it was insignificant numerically in either North or South
Ameria. But it had several advantages as well as problems that were to become
apparent. Although on paper it had several separate institutions giving degrees, in
actual practice the Scottish Rite was much more unified than the York Rite. In
practice it was administered as a single organization. This meant that when it
succeeded it had a larger income than the York bodies, each of which had their own
treasuries. And the Scottish Rite needed that income as its rituals were reworked
and enlarged upon until they became large an expensive stage productions which
them membership enjoyed seeing as spectators rather than as participants, which
seems one reason for its growth and its eventual eclipsing in many jurisdictions of
the York Rite. Moreover, the general public came to recognize that the 32nd
and 33rd degrees awarded by the Scottish Rite were an accolade and distinction
which never really attached to the Knight Templar degree in the York system.
Conclusion: The Urban Rite
The Scottish degrees were more akin to theatrical productions than to simple
initiations in the lodge room over the general store. They also required the
candidate to make a considerable financial investment as he had to pay fees for each
degree. While it was possible in some smaller cities to attract enough candidates and
find the resources to put on the rituals up to the level of the 14th degree or
sometimes the 18th degree, the degrees above that came to be the prerogative of
the large city. Since Masonry grew as cities grew, and since, although it was present
in both North and South America during the eighteenth and early nineteenth
centuries, its expansion parallels urban growth in the Hemisphere, the developing
connection between Scottish Rite Masonry and urbanization is readily suggested.
In no case did the Scottish Rite as it become worldwide establish itself in the
countryside as did the York bodies. Today one can still take the York degrees in the
goldfields of Western Australia or in a fishing port in Northern Maine, but if a
candidate wants to take the Scottish degrees, then a city must be at hand.
So, in contrast with the continuing if unequal rivalry of York and Scottish
Masonry is some places, the story of Freemasonry in Latin America is one of the
dominance of urban Scottish Rite Freemasonry. While a number of different
Masonic systems have persisted, the region is particularly identified with what is
in fact one of the more lavish rites in terms of initiation dramas. The Scottish
variety came to dominate and still does dominates the scene.
In many American cities the Scottish Rite similarly became predominant.
The Yorkists have taken a beating everywhere. But they still have an advantage in
small towns, where the Scottish Rite has never been able to achieve the success it has
in urban centers. When Latin American establish connectitons with American
Masonry, this Scottish urban predominance means that the American they seek
out are often ScottishR iters.
Kevin Christiano writes about urban growth that, "...differentiation of social
institutions and heterogeneity of social forms are companions to population
growth as a result of a at least three related processes: ecological, demographic, and
cultural." Ecologically, competition for resources forces specialization.
Demographics undergird the introduction of social influences in the city. The
cultural process means that the city has "subcultural constituencies of sufficient size
to support specialized even eccentric cultural institutions, associations, and
services which are impossible to sustain in smaller locales." Whether secret
ritualistic movements like the Scottish Rite can be counted as an "urban amenity"
is perhaps a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder,-- but regardless, Scotish
Rite Masonry is one of the most outstanding examples of a fraternal movement
that was predominantly urban.
---NOTES